| Network Working Group | M. Thomson |
| Internet-Draft | Mozilla |
| Intended status: Standards Track | August 16, 2017 |
| Expires: February 17, 2018 |
Message Encryption for Web Push
draft-ietf-webpush-encryption-latest
A message encryption scheme is described for the Web Push protocol. This scheme provides confidentiality and integrity for messages sent from an Application Server to a User Agent.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on February 17, 2018.
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
The Web Push protocol [RFC8030] is an intermediated protocol by necessity. Messages from an Application Server are delivered to a User Agent (UA) via a Push Service.
+-------+ +--------------+ +-------------+
| UA | | Push Service | | Application |
+-------+ +--------------+ +-------------+
| | |
| Setup | |
|<====================>| |
| Provide Subscription |
|-------------------------------------------->|
| | |
: : :
| | Push Message |
| Push Message |<---------------------|
|<---------------------| |
| | |
This document describes how messages sent using this protocol can be secured against inspection, modification and forgery by a Push Service.
Web Push messages are the payload of an HTTP message [RFC7230]. These messages are encrypted using an encrypted content encoding [RFC8188]. This document describes how this content encoding is applied and describes a recommended key management scheme.
For efficiency reasons, multiple users of Web Push often share a central agent that aggregates push functionality. This agent can enforce the use of this encryption scheme by applications that use push messaging. An agent that only delivers messages that are properly encrypted strongly encourages the end-to-end protection of messages.
A web browser that implements the Web Push API [API] can enforce the use of encryption by forwarding only those messages that were properly encrypted.
The words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “SHOULD”, and “MAY” are used in this document. It’s not shouting, when they are capitalized, they have the special meaning described in [RFC2119].
This document uses the terminology from [RFC8030], primarily User Agent, Push Service, and Application Server.
Encrypting a push message uses elliptic-curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) [ECDH] on the P-256 curve [FIPS186] to establish a shared secret (see Section 3.1) and a symmetric secret for authentication (see Section 3.2).
A User Agent generates an ECDH key pair and authentication secret that it associates with each subscription it creates. The ECDH public key and the authentication secret are sent to the Application Server with other details of the push subscription.
When sending a message, an Application Server generates an ECDH key pair and a random salt. The ECDH public key is encoded into the keyid parameter of the encrypted content coding header, the salt in the salt parameter of that same header (see Section 2.1 of [RFC8188]). The ECDH key pair can be discarded after encrypting the message.
The content of the push message is encrypted or decrypted using a content encryption key and nonce that is derived using all of these inputs and the process described in Section 3.
The application using the subscription distributes the subscription public key and authentication secret to an authorized Application Server. This could be sent along with other subscription information that is provided by the User Agent, such as the push subscription URI.
An application MUST use an authenticated, confidentiality protected communications medium for this purpose. In addition to the reasons described in [RFC8030], this ensures that the authentication secret is not revealed to unauthorized entities, which can be used to generate push messages that will be accepted by the User Agent.
Most applications that use push messaging have a pre-existing relationship with an Application Server that can be used for distribution of subscription data. An authenticated communication mechanism that provides adequate confidentiality and integrity protection, such as HTTPS [RFC2818], is sufficient.
Push message encryption happens in four phases:
The key derivation process is summarized in Section 3.4. Restrictions on the use of the encrypted content coding are described in Section 4.
For each new subscription that the User Agent generates for an Application, it also generates a P-256 [FIPS186] key pair for use in elliptic-curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) [ECDH].
When sending a push message, the Application Server also generates a new ECDH key pair on the same P-256 curve.
The ECDH public key for the Application Server is included as the “keyid” parameter in the encrypted content coding header (see Section 2.1 of [RFC8188].
An Application Server combines its ECDH private key with the public key provided by the User Agent using the process described in [ECDH]; on receipt of the push message, a User Agent combines its private key with the public key provided by the Application Server in the keyid parameter in the same way. These operations produce the same value for the ECDH shared secret.
To ensure that push messages are correctly authenticated, a symmetric authentication secret is added to the information generated by a User Agent. The authentication secret is mixed into the key derivation process shown in Section 3.3.
A User Agent MUST generate and provide a hard to guess sequence of 16 octets that is used for authentication of push messages. This SHOULD be generated by a cryptographically strong random number generator [RFC4086].
The shared secret produced by ECDH is combined with the authentication secret using the Hashed Message Authentication Code (HMAC)-based key derivation function (HKDF) [RFC5869]. This produces the input keying material used by [RFC8188].
The HKDF function uses SHA-256 hash algorithm [FIPS180-4] with the following inputs:
key_info = "WebPush: info" || 0x00 || ua_public || as_public
This results in a the final content encryption key and nonce generation using the following sequence, which is shown here in pseudocode with HKDF expanded into separate discrete steps using HMAC with SHA-256:
-- For a User Agent: ecdh_secret = ECDH(ua_private, as_public) auth_secret = random(16) salt = <from content coding header> -- For an Application Server: ecdh_secret = ECDH(as_private, ua_public) auth_secret = <from User Agent> salt = random(16) -- For both: ## Use HKDF to combine the ECDH and authentication secrets # HKDF-Extract(salt=auth_secret, IKM=ecdh_secret) PRK_key = HMAC-SHA-256(auth_secret, ecdh_secret) # HKDF-Expand(PRK_key, key_info, L_key=32) key_info = "WebPush: info" || 0x00 || ua_public || as_public IKM = HMAC-SHA-256(PRK_key, key_info || 0x01) ## HKDF calculations from RFC 8188 # HKDF-Extract(salt, IKM) PRK = HMAC-SHA-256(salt, IKM) # HKDF-Expand(PRK, cek_info, L_cek=16) cek_info = "Content-Encoding: aes128gcm" || 0x00 CEK = HMAC-SHA-256(PRK, cek_info || 0x01)[0..15] # HKDF-Expand(PRK, nonce_info, L_nonce=12) nonce_info = "Content-Encoding: nonce" || 0x00 NONCE = HMAC-SHA-256(PRK, nonce_info || 0x01)[0..11]
Note that this omits the exclusive OR of the final nonce with the record sequence number, since push messages contain only a single record (see Section 4) and the sequence number of the first record is zero.
An Application Server MUST encrypt a push message with a single record. This allows for a minimal receiver implementation that handles a single record. An application server MUST set the rs parameter in the aes128gcm content coding header to a size that is greater than the sum of the lengths of the plaintext, the padding delimiter (1 octet), any padding, and the authentication tag (16 octets).
A push message MUST include the application server ECDH public key in the keyid parameter of the encrypted content coding header. The uncompressed point form defined in [X9.62] (that is, a 65 octet sequence that starts with a 0x04 octet) forms the entirety of the keyid. Note that this means that the keyid parameter will not be valid UTF-8 as recommended in [RFC8188].
A push service is not required to support more than 4096 octets of payload body (see Section 7.2 of [RFC8030]). Absent header (86 octets), padding (minimum 1 octet), and expansion for AEAD_AES_128_GCM (16 octets), this equates to at most 3993 octets of plaintext.
An Application Server MUST NOT use other content encodings for push messages. In particular, content encodings that compress could result in leaking of push message contents. The Content-Encoding header field therefore has exactly one value, which is aes128gcm. Multiple aes128gcm values are not permitted.
A User Agent is not required to support multiple records. A User Agent MAY ignore the rs field. If a record size is unchecked, decryption will fail with high probability for all valid cases. The padding delimiter octet MUST be checked, values other than 0x02 MUST cause the message to be discarded.
The following example shows a push message being sent to a push service.
POST /push/JzLQ3raZJfFBR0aqvOMsLrt54w4rJUsV HTTP/1.1 Host: push.example.net TTL: 10 Content-Length: 145 Content-Encoding: aes128gcm DGv6ra1nlYgDCS1FRnbzlwAAEABBBP4z9KsN6nGRTbVYI_c7VJSPQTBtkgcy27ml mlMoZIIgDll6e3vCYLocInmYWAmS6TlzAC8wEqKK6PBru3jl7A_yl95bQpu6cVPT pK4Mqgkf1CXztLVBSt2Ks3oZwbuwXPXLWyouBWLVWGNWQexSgSxsj_Qulcy4a-fN
This example shows the ASCII encoded string, “When I grow up, I want to be a watermelon”. The content body is shown here with line wrapping and URL-safe base64url [RFC4648] encoding to meet presentation constraints.
The keys used are shown below using the uncompressed form [X9.62] encoded using base64url.
Authentication Secret: BTBZMqHH6r4Tts7J_aSIgg
Receiver:
private key: q1dXpw3UpT5VOmu_cf_v6ih07Aems3njxI-JWgLcM94
public key: BCVxsr7N_eNgVRqvHtD0zTZsEc6-VV-JvLexhqUzORcx
aOzi6-AYWXvTBHm4bjyPjs7Vd8pZGH6SRpkNtoIAiw4
Sender:
private key: yfWPiYE-n46HLnH0KqZOF1fJJU3MYrct3AELtAQ-oRw
public key: BP4z9KsN6nGRTbVYI_c7VJSPQTBtkgcy27mlmlMoZIIg
Dll6e3vCYLocInmYWAmS6TlzAC8wEqKK6PBru3jl7A8
Intermediate values for this example are included in Appendix A.
[[RFC EDITOR: please remove this section before publication.]] This document makes no request of IANA.
The privacy and security considerations of [RFC8030] all apply to the use of this mechanism.
The security considerations of [RFC8188] describe the limitations of the content encoding. In particular, any HTTP header fields are not protected by the content encoding scheme. A User Agent MUST consider HTTP header fields to have come from the Push Service. Though header fields might be necessary for processing an HTTP response correctly, they are not needed for correct operation of the protocol. An application on the User Agent that uses information from header fields to alter their processing of a push message is exposed to a risk of attack by the Push Service.
The timing and length of communication cannot be hidden from the Push Service. While an outside observer might see individual messages intermixed with each other, the Push Service will see which Application Server is talking to which User Agent, and the subscription that is used. Additionally, the length of messages could be revealed unless the padding provided by the content encoding scheme is used to obscure length.
The User Agent and Application MUST verify that the public key they receive is on the P-256 curve. Failure to validate a public key can allow an attacker to extract a private key. The appropriate validation procedures are defined in Section 4.3.7 of [X9.62] and alternatively in Section 5.6.2.6 of [KEYAGREEMENT]. This process consists of three steps:
For these curves, implementers do not need to verify membership in the correct subgroup.
| [API] | Beverloo, P. and M. Thomson, "Web Push API", 2015. |
| [KEYAGREEMENT] | Barker, E., Lily Chen, ., Roginsky, A. and M. Smid, "Recommendation for Pair-Wise Key Establishment Schemes Using Discrete Logarithm Cryptography", NIST Special Publication 800-38D, May 2013. |
| [RFC2818] | Rescorla, E., "HTTP Over TLS", RFC 2818, DOI 10.17487/RFC2818, May 2000. |
| [RFC4648] | Josefsson, S., "The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings", RFC 4648, DOI 10.17487/RFC4648, October 2006. |
| [RFC7230] | Fielding, R. and J. Reschke, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing", RFC 7230, DOI 10.17487/RFC7230, June 2014. |
The intermediate values calculated for the example in Section 5 are shown here. The base64url values in these examples include whitespace that can be removed.
The following are inputs to the calculation:
Note that knowledge of just one of the private keys is necessary. The Application Server randomly generates the salt value, whereas salt is input to the receiver.
This produces the following intermediate values:
The salt, record size of 4096, and application server public key produce an 86 octet header of DGv6ra1nlYgDCS1FRnbzlwAAEABBBP4z 9KsN6nGRTbVYI_c7VJSPQTBtkgcy27ml mlMoZIIgDll6e3vCYLocInmYWAmS6Tlz AC8wEqKK6PBru3jl7A8.
The push message plaintext has the padding delimiter octet (0x02) appended to produce V2hlbiBJIGdyb3cgdXAsIEkgd2FudCB0 byBiZSBhIHdhdGVybWVsb24C. The plaintext is then encrypted with AES-GCM, which emits ciphertext of 8pfeW0KbunFT06SuDKoJH9Ql87S1QUrd irN6GcG7sFz1y1sqLgVi1VhjVkHsUoEs bI_0LpXMuGvnzQ.
The header and cipher text are concatenated and produce the result shown in Section 5.